Times of Bennett
ArticleFeatures

Mayawati shoots down BSP-BJP ‘tie-up’ rumor

Mayawati quashes speculation over the possibility of a post-poll tie-up with the ruling BJP.

Published:March 9, 2022 at 11:47 AM4 min read
Mayawati shoots down BSP-BJP ‘tie-up’ rumor
By Kanika Bisht

Mayawati on Thursday, February 24, sought to quash speculation over the possibility of a post-poll tie-up with the ruling Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP), saying her Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP), was not the B team of any party and the rivals were trying to mislead her supporters.

The speculation was triggered by a recent remark by Union Home Minister Amit Shah that Mayawati's BSP remained “relevant” in the Uttar Pradesh assembly polls and will get Dalit votes.

Mayawati had responded by saying that it was Shah's “magnanimity” that he acknowledged this but added that the BSP will also get the votes of other communities.

"Ever since the Union Home Minister gave a statement on the BSP's position among Dalits and Muslims after the polling in western UP, rival political parties and the media have started saying that it is the 'B' team of the BJP, when there is no truth in this," the BSP supremo said at an election meeting here.

She also accused the Congress, the Samajwadi Party and the BJP as having a "casteist mindset", a charge she also levelled on the media.

Mayawati asked why the Samajwadi Party had allied with the BSP in a previous assembly election and then in the Lok Sabha polls if it was the BJP's B team. She said the media should also tell this to people.

She also referred to the BJP extending support to SP patriarch Mulayam Singh Yadav's government in the past.

The Dalit leader targeted the Congress and asked, “Why did the Congress once contest the assembly elections with the BSP and why did it seek support for its government at the Centre?”

She called it the rivals' “disgusting politics”.

The BSP supremo said the truth is that the BSP is a national-level party and not "the A or B team of any party".

In a recent television interview, Amit Shah had said the BSP remained relevant in UP.

“I believe it will get votes. I don't know how much of it will convert into seats, but it will get votes," the BJP leader had said, triggering speculation over the possibility of a post poll understanding between the two parties. In 1995, 1997 and 2002, Mayawati was sworn in as chief minister with the BJP's support.

Lashing out at the media, Mayawati accused it of misleading the Scheduled Caste community by saying that “your behan ji” doesn't visit victims of atrocities on Dalits when Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi Vadra always does this.

Mayawati said like Sonia Gandhi, she is the national president of a party and not g just an in-charge of a state -- like Priyanka Gandhi.

She said her party too has office bearers who, like the Congress UP in-charge, rush to help victims of atrocities on Dalits. But there is “no drama before the media”, as in the case of the Congress and other parties, she added.

She asked her supporters to remain alert of the “casteist media” and “double-faced” political parties.

She said it was unfortunate that there were “conspiracies” to influence the elections in the name of terrorism or activities of the investigating agencies in Maharashtra.

The BSP president said her party is contesting the elections alone with full might so that the good days of the BSP government return to Uttar Pradesh.

Like earlier, the BSP has given tickets to all sections of society (sarv samaj), she said.

If the BSP forms the government, its priority will be to provide jobs and steps will be taken remove poverty, she said.

Farmers will not be disappointed and the “sants” and “mahants” will be respected, she said.
Tags
#Election 22#UP Election 22#Mayawati#BSP#BJP#Priyanka Gandhi#Congress#samajwadi party#Bahujan Samaj Party#Bhartiya Janata Party

Related Articles

Unravelling The Language Of Consent In Qala's “Ghodey Pe Sawaar”
Article
Popculture

Unravelling The Language Of Consent In Qala's “Ghodey Pe Sawaar”

This article dissects Qala's lead single 'Ghode Pe Sawaar', through a feminist lens.

May 2, 20265 min
#ghodey pe sawaar#urmila#qalas+4 more
Beyond Headlines: The war of West Asia from youth's lens
Article
Features

Beyond Headlines: The war of West Asia from youth's lens

Has the popularity of social media hastened war news reporting or sensationalism? Does the youth of today find themselves torn between deciphering real news and misniformation? This article aims to look beyond the surface and uncover the answers to these questions and more.

Apr 24, 20266 min
#west asia#prabhjot kaur#point+3 more
Certified Out of Existence: Why India's 2026 Trans Amendment Bill faced severe backlash
Article
Features

Certified Out of Existence: Why India's 2026 Trans Amendment Bill faced severe backlash

On March 13, 2026, India's government introduced the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill in the Lok Sabha, which swiftly passed both houses by March 25 and became law despite widespread protests from trans activists, lawyers, and opposition parties. The bill scraps self-identification for gender—upheld in the 2014 NALSA Supreme Court judgment—replacing it with mandatory medical certification by a board and District Magistrate approval, while limiting recognition to hijra, kinner, and intersex groups, effectively sidelining trans men, women, and non-binary individuals. It also imposes severe penalties, including life imprisonment, for "coercing" others into transgender identity, which critics fear could criminalize family and allies. Activists like Krishanu, Raghavi, Aryan Pasha, and Kanmani slammed it as unconstitutional (breaching Articles 14, 15, 19, 21), arbitrary, and reminiscent of colonial-era laws like the Criminal Tribes Act, with protests erupting in cities from Delhi to Hyderabad. Amid global anti-trans backsliding (e.g., TGEU's 2025 index, US and UK developments), figures like Aakar Patel of Amnesty International India decried it as state overreach on inherent identity. Affecting ~487,803 trans persons (only ~32,500 with ID cards), the law unravels hard-won rights, framing the fight as one for the state's recognition of self-naming over official control.

Apr 24, 20266 min
#bill#lok sabha#supreme court+2 more
11,000 litres of milk: Spiritual offering or extreme prolifigacy?
Article
Features

11,000 litres of milk: Spiritual offering or extreme prolifigacy?

Video Controversy SynopsisA video from April 9, 2026, showing 11,000 liters of milk (worth ₹5.5–7.7 lakh) poured into the Narmada River during a religious ritual sparked national outrage online, pitting devotion against accusations of waste, excess, and environmental harm.Public BacklashSocial media users condemned the act as irresponsible amid food insecurity and river pollution risks, arguing the milk should have fed the needy instead of treating the river like a "sink."Defenses and Expert WarningsSupporters defended it as sincere faith, but environmentalists like Subhash Pandey and Ajay Dube highlighted ecological damage: the organic load depletes oxygen, harms aquatic life, drinking water, and local communities.Broader ImplicationsThe Narmada's cultural significance amplified the debate, turning a local ritual into a flashpoint on balancing tradition with ethics, responsibility, and river health—raising timeless questions on when devotion crosses into waste.

Apr 24, 20264 min
#narmada#subhash pandey#ajay dube+2 more
BENNETT DIALOGUES launch with the War in West Asia
Article
Campus

BENNETT DIALOGUES launch with the War in West Asia

Bennett University has launched BENNETT DIALOGUES, a fortnightly talk series conceptualized by Chancellor Vineet Jain (Times Group MD) to help students grasp global geopolitical shifts. Led by Prof. Dhiraj Singh (Head, Centre for Media & Technology), it features informal fireside chats and Q&A with experts in geopolitics, business, and media. The series aims to connect world events to everyday impacts, like how the US-Israel-Iran war affects India's petrol and LPG prices. The inaugural edition on April 21 explores "The War in West Asia," with Times Now's Zakka Jacob and Dr. Waiel Awwad (Syrian-origin expert on West Asia conflicts, based in Delhi). Prof. Singh highlights its blend of Times Group media legacy and Bennett's academic excellence, benefiting media, liberal arts, business, and law students.

Apr 18, 20262 min
#dialogues#zakka jacob#dhiraj singh+3 more
War bugle disguised as a ceasefire: Examining Lebanon's situation post Israeli air strikes
Article
Features

War bugle disguised as a ceasefire: Examining Lebanon's situation post Israeli air strikes

On April 8, a fragile ceasefire briefly eased global tensions after 40 days of war between Israel, Iran, and allies, announced by Trump on Truth Social and confirmed by Iran and Pakistan's PM Shehbaz Sharif, who brokered it. Celebrations ensued worldwide as markets surged and oil prices fell, until Israeli jets struck Lebanon that morning, killing 357 civilians in what Beirut dubbed "Black Wednesday," while Israel excluded Lebanon from the deal. No formal agreement exists; conflicting statements emerged immediately, with Pakistan and Iran insisting it covered Lebanon, but Israel and the US rejecting that after a Trump-Netanyahu call. Lebanon, already devastated with over 2,000 deaths since March, was sidelined in a multi-front conflict involving Hezbollah, Iraqi militias, and Gulf interceptions. Post-ceasefire issues mounted: Iran kept the Strait of Hormuz choked, charging exorbitant fees and slashing traffic from 110 daily ships to four. Historic US-Iran talks in Islamabad on April 11 collapsed, prompting a US naval blockade that doubled down on the disruption, halting all oil route traffic (20% of global supply). The two-week truce window lasts until April 22 amid ongoing messages, but optimism fades after the deadliest civilian day coincided with its announcement.

Apr 17, 20264 min
#lebanon#trump#iran+5 more