Times of Bennett
ArticleFeatures

E-waste policy eludes implementation

Published:May 30, 2021 at 05:11 PM3 min read
E-waste policy eludes implementation
By Vidhi Goswami
MUMBAI: There is an electronic waste management strategy to address the immediate concerns about pollution emanating from electronic devices but unfortunately it is not implemented properly.
However, some private organisations are working to spread awareness about the problem of electronic waste and solutions. One such non-profit organisation is Toxics Link. “Our goal right now is to bring focus on reducing e-waste, by bringing back the repair culture, as recycling cannot be the complete or the only solution” said Priti Mahesh, Chief Programme Coordinator at Toxics Link.
Toxics Link is an NGO “working for environmental justice and freedom from toxics”. It collects and shares information about the sources and dangers of the poisons in the environment and bodies, as well as about clean and sustainable alternatives for India and the rest of the world. “Increasing use of electronics means huge quantities of waste , and improper e-waste management can be very harmful to the environment,” according to Mahesh.
“The lifespan of electronic appliances is getting shorter. When it comes to phones, it is now 2-3 years,” she said. Electronics are now being designed for dump, increasing the amount of waste generated.
“With new versions of smartphones, televisions and refrigerators, there seems to be no end to the demand for electronics and hence the waste,” said Mahesh. “People should understand that environment and health are interlinked, and waste impacts both. It is important to bring in the minimalistic lifestyle – people should buy new gadgets only when they need them and not just because there is a new model available ,” said Mahesh.
New phones are entering the market with a lot of changes in their features. Various companies are launching unique phones, with glass back, gorilla screen, new chargers that make the phone’s battery last longer, you name it. “I believe a certain company is the worst offender generating a lot of e-waste. Every time you see them change their chargers or some other element, rendering the older version useless. The corporations have to be held liable for this,” said Mahesh.
She said corporates should work hand in hand with the people at large if we have to take care of this planet. The daily household waste also at times includes a few e-waste, be it spoiled wires, damaged earphones or end-of-life lamps. Not having proper e-waste management systems means that the mixed-up waste is either dumped at the landfill or picked up by the informal sector.
“Pollution control boards and municipal corporations should monitor the handling of e-waste ; but again, if we don’t have adequate capacity, punitive measures should be taken to put the system back on track,” said Mahesh.
According to Mahesh, there is still not enough awareness in our society. The government has initiated programmes like Swachh Bharat which looked at waste as an issue, but a lot still needs to be done. “There should be incentives and disincentives, for people to actually take action and bring about change in their behaviour with regard to waste management,” Mahesh said.
The story first appeared in The Times of Bennett, the lab newspaper produced by the first semester students of The Times School of Media.
Tags
#electronics#Priti Mahesh#E-waste#times of bennett#Times School of Media#Toxics Link#SWACHH BHARAT

Related Articles

Unravelling The Language Of Consent In Qala's “Ghodey Pe Sawaar”
Article
Popculture

Unravelling The Language Of Consent In Qala's “Ghodey Pe Sawaar”

This article dissects Qala's lead single 'Ghode Pe Sawaar', through a feminist lens.

May 2, 20265 min
#ghodey pe sawaar#urmila#qalas+4 more
Beyond Headlines: The war of West Asia from youth's lens
Article
Features

Beyond Headlines: The war of West Asia from youth's lens

Has the popularity of social media hastened war news reporting or sensationalism? Does the youth of today find themselves torn between deciphering real news and misniformation? This article aims to look beyond the surface and uncover the answers to these questions and more.

Apr 24, 20266 min
#west asia#prabhjot kaur#point+3 more
Certified Out of Existence: Why India's 2026 Trans Amendment Bill faced severe backlash
Article
Features

Certified Out of Existence: Why India's 2026 Trans Amendment Bill faced severe backlash

On March 13, 2026, India's government introduced the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill in the Lok Sabha, which swiftly passed both houses by March 25 and became law despite widespread protests from trans activists, lawyers, and opposition parties. The bill scraps self-identification for gender—upheld in the 2014 NALSA Supreme Court judgment—replacing it with mandatory medical certification by a board and District Magistrate approval, while limiting recognition to hijra, kinner, and intersex groups, effectively sidelining trans men, women, and non-binary individuals. It also imposes severe penalties, including life imprisonment, for "coercing" others into transgender identity, which critics fear could criminalize family and allies. Activists like Krishanu, Raghavi, Aryan Pasha, and Kanmani slammed it as unconstitutional (breaching Articles 14, 15, 19, 21), arbitrary, and reminiscent of colonial-era laws like the Criminal Tribes Act, with protests erupting in cities from Delhi to Hyderabad. Amid global anti-trans backsliding (e.g., TGEU's 2025 index, US and UK developments), figures like Aakar Patel of Amnesty International India decried it as state overreach on inherent identity. Affecting ~487,803 trans persons (only ~32,500 with ID cards), the law unravels hard-won rights, framing the fight as one for the state's recognition of self-naming over official control.

Apr 24, 20266 min
#bill#lok sabha#supreme court+2 more
11,000 litres of milk: Spiritual offering or extreme prolifigacy?
Article
Features

11,000 litres of milk: Spiritual offering or extreme prolifigacy?

Video Controversy SynopsisA video from April 9, 2026, showing 11,000 liters of milk (worth ₹5.5–7.7 lakh) poured into the Narmada River during a religious ritual sparked national outrage online, pitting devotion against accusations of waste, excess, and environmental harm.Public BacklashSocial media users condemned the act as irresponsible amid food insecurity and river pollution risks, arguing the milk should have fed the needy instead of treating the river like a "sink."Defenses and Expert WarningsSupporters defended it as sincere faith, but environmentalists like Subhash Pandey and Ajay Dube highlighted ecological damage: the organic load depletes oxygen, harms aquatic life, drinking water, and local communities.Broader ImplicationsThe Narmada's cultural significance amplified the debate, turning a local ritual into a flashpoint on balancing tradition with ethics, responsibility, and river health—raising timeless questions on when devotion crosses into waste.

Apr 24, 20264 min
#narmada#subhash pandey#ajay dube+2 more
BENNETT DIALOGUES launch with the War in West Asia
Article
Campus

BENNETT DIALOGUES launch with the War in West Asia

Bennett University has launched BENNETT DIALOGUES, a fortnightly talk series conceptualized by Chancellor Vineet Jain (Times Group MD) to help students grasp global geopolitical shifts. Led by Prof. Dhiraj Singh (Head, Centre for Media & Technology), it features informal fireside chats and Q&A with experts in geopolitics, business, and media. The series aims to connect world events to everyday impacts, like how the US-Israel-Iran war affects India's petrol and LPG prices. The inaugural edition on April 21 explores "The War in West Asia," with Times Now's Zakka Jacob and Dr. Waiel Awwad (Syrian-origin expert on West Asia conflicts, based in Delhi). Prof. Singh highlights its blend of Times Group media legacy and Bennett's academic excellence, benefiting media, liberal arts, business, and law students.

Apr 18, 20262 min
#dialogues#zakka jacob#dhiraj singh+3 more
War bugle disguised as a ceasefire: Examining Lebanon's situation post Israeli air strikes
Article
Features

War bugle disguised as a ceasefire: Examining Lebanon's situation post Israeli air strikes

On April 8, a fragile ceasefire briefly eased global tensions after 40 days of war between Israel, Iran, and allies, announced by Trump on Truth Social and confirmed by Iran and Pakistan's PM Shehbaz Sharif, who brokered it. Celebrations ensued worldwide as markets surged and oil prices fell, until Israeli jets struck Lebanon that morning, killing 357 civilians in what Beirut dubbed "Black Wednesday," while Israel excluded Lebanon from the deal. No formal agreement exists; conflicting statements emerged immediately, with Pakistan and Iran insisting it covered Lebanon, but Israel and the US rejecting that after a Trump-Netanyahu call. Lebanon, already devastated with over 2,000 deaths since March, was sidelined in a multi-front conflict involving Hezbollah, Iraqi militias, and Gulf interceptions. Post-ceasefire issues mounted: Iran kept the Strait of Hormuz choked, charging exorbitant fees and slashing traffic from 110 daily ships to four. Historic US-Iran talks in Islamabad on April 11 collapsed, prompting a US naval blockade that doubled down on the disruption, halting all oil route traffic (20% of global supply). The two-week truce window lasts until April 22 amid ongoing messages, but optimism fades after the deadliest civilian day coincided with its announcement.

Apr 17, 20264 min
#lebanon#trump#iran+5 more