Times of Bennett
ArticleFeatures

Why Gujarat farmers support the new farm laws ?

Published:March 9, 2021 at 10:28 AM3 min read
Why Gujarat farmers support the new farm laws ?
By Omji Dubey

Vadodara: There has been unrest near the Singhu border in Delhi after the farmers from Punjab and Haryana gathered there to protest the Centre’s farm laws. Farmers are opposing it and are demanding for the repeal of these farm laws. But the farmers from Vadodara have a totally different story.

Sailesh, a farmer from Vadodara says he supports the new laws. “I sell my produce in the nearby mandis. I face problems in receiving the payment many a times. But with the implementation of new farm laws, I will be able to sell my produce directly to a company,” he says.

He believes though the laws are in interest of the farmers there should be some changes in the laws regarding contract farming and Minimum Support Price policy. He said that subsidy provided by the government is an issue for the farmers in Gujarat and nearby states because most of the subsidy goes to the farmers in Punjab and Haryana. According to a report released by the central government, one-third of the total government subsidies goes to states like Punjab, UP and Andhra Pradesh.

“Farmers should also upgrade himself in this hi-tech era which can only be done through education. I cannot sign up for contract farming unless I am totally aware of the terms and conditions. The farmer is being abused by these contactors anyways. They will take the produce and then they ask us to collect payment after two or three days which gradually gets extended up to two-three months. That is something which the government should work on,” Sailesh says.

Another farmer, Govind, who owns 5-acres of farmland, says, “Ten days before the produce is ready prices start dropping in the market. But as soon as the farmer sells his produce at such low rates, prices go up immediately. That is how farmers are being cheated by these middlemen and contractors. Therefore, MSP is an important issue for us.”

When questioned about the manipulation by middlemen through hoarding, Govind says, “Though many items were removed as essential commodities in this new farm bill, it also states that if there is a shortage then these items can also be brought back into the essential commodities. In the end that will help the farmers.”

Another reason why Gujarati farmers support the new laws is the provision of going to court against contracts being broken. “If the situation arises that a farmer is being cheated by the contractor then there are provisions in the farm bill that the farmer can appeal before magistrate,” says Sailesh. “If a farmer is being careful and gets in contract with some big company then that can definitely help farmers not only financially but also psychologically. So that they know their produce will get good price. It will be a lot better than what they are receiving now,” he adds.

When asked about the farmers who are protesting against the farm laws, Govind defend his decision to support the law, “Definitely there is some misunderstanding among those farmers regarding this issue. The laws surely need some changes but on in the long term, it benefits the farmers.”

This story was first published in the The Times of Bennett print edition (February 2021), a student-run initiative of The Times School of Media, Bennett University.

(The writer is a first year student of BA (Journalism and Mass Communication) of The Times School of Media)
Join exciting programmes offered by Bennett University
Tags
#farmers in Gujarat#Singhu border protests#new farm laws#Farmers Protests#Centre's new farm laws

Related Articles

Unravelling The Language Of Consent In Qala's “Ghodey Pe Sawaar”
Article
Popculture

Unravelling The Language Of Consent In Qala's “Ghodey Pe Sawaar”

This article dissects Qala's lead single 'Ghode Pe Sawaar', through a feminist lens.

May 2, 20265 min
#ghodey pe sawaar#urmila#qalas+4 more
Beyond Headlines: The war of West Asia from youth's lens
Article
Features

Beyond Headlines: The war of West Asia from youth's lens

Has the popularity of social media hastened war news reporting or sensationalism? Does the youth of today find themselves torn between deciphering real news and misniformation? This article aims to look beyond the surface and uncover the answers to these questions and more.

Apr 24, 20266 min
#west asia#prabhjot kaur#point+3 more
Certified Out of Existence: Why India's 2026 Trans Amendment Bill faced severe backlash
Article
Features

Certified Out of Existence: Why India's 2026 Trans Amendment Bill faced severe backlash

On March 13, 2026, India's government introduced the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill in the Lok Sabha, which swiftly passed both houses by March 25 and became law despite widespread protests from trans activists, lawyers, and opposition parties. The bill scraps self-identification for gender—upheld in the 2014 NALSA Supreme Court judgment—replacing it with mandatory medical certification by a board and District Magistrate approval, while limiting recognition to hijra, kinner, and intersex groups, effectively sidelining trans men, women, and non-binary individuals. It also imposes severe penalties, including life imprisonment, for "coercing" others into transgender identity, which critics fear could criminalize family and allies. Activists like Krishanu, Raghavi, Aryan Pasha, and Kanmani slammed it as unconstitutional (breaching Articles 14, 15, 19, 21), arbitrary, and reminiscent of colonial-era laws like the Criminal Tribes Act, with protests erupting in cities from Delhi to Hyderabad. Amid global anti-trans backsliding (e.g., TGEU's 2025 index, US and UK developments), figures like Aakar Patel of Amnesty International India decried it as state overreach on inherent identity. Affecting ~487,803 trans persons (only ~32,500 with ID cards), the law unravels hard-won rights, framing the fight as one for the state's recognition of self-naming over official control.

Apr 24, 20266 min
#bill#lok sabha#supreme court+2 more
11,000 litres of milk: Spiritual offering or extreme prolifigacy?
Article
Features

11,000 litres of milk: Spiritual offering or extreme prolifigacy?

Video Controversy SynopsisA video from April 9, 2026, showing 11,000 liters of milk (worth ₹5.5–7.7 lakh) poured into the Narmada River during a religious ritual sparked national outrage online, pitting devotion against accusations of waste, excess, and environmental harm.Public BacklashSocial media users condemned the act as irresponsible amid food insecurity and river pollution risks, arguing the milk should have fed the needy instead of treating the river like a "sink."Defenses and Expert WarningsSupporters defended it as sincere faith, but environmentalists like Subhash Pandey and Ajay Dube highlighted ecological damage: the organic load depletes oxygen, harms aquatic life, drinking water, and local communities.Broader ImplicationsThe Narmada's cultural significance amplified the debate, turning a local ritual into a flashpoint on balancing tradition with ethics, responsibility, and river health—raising timeless questions on when devotion crosses into waste.

Apr 24, 20264 min
#narmada#subhash pandey#ajay dube+2 more
BENNETT DIALOGUES launch with the War in West Asia
Article
Campus

BENNETT DIALOGUES launch with the War in West Asia

Bennett University has launched BENNETT DIALOGUES, a fortnightly talk series conceptualized by Chancellor Vineet Jain (Times Group MD) to help students grasp global geopolitical shifts. Led by Prof. Dhiraj Singh (Head, Centre for Media & Technology), it features informal fireside chats and Q&A with experts in geopolitics, business, and media. The series aims to connect world events to everyday impacts, like how the US-Israel-Iran war affects India's petrol and LPG prices. The inaugural edition on April 21 explores "The War in West Asia," with Times Now's Zakka Jacob and Dr. Waiel Awwad (Syrian-origin expert on West Asia conflicts, based in Delhi). Prof. Singh highlights its blend of Times Group media legacy and Bennett's academic excellence, benefiting media, liberal arts, business, and law students.

Apr 18, 20262 min
#dialogues#zakka jacob#dhiraj singh+3 more
War bugle disguised as a ceasefire: Examining Lebanon's situation post Israeli air strikes
Article
Features

War bugle disguised as a ceasefire: Examining Lebanon's situation post Israeli air strikes

On April 8, a fragile ceasefire briefly eased global tensions after 40 days of war between Israel, Iran, and allies, announced by Trump on Truth Social and confirmed by Iran and Pakistan's PM Shehbaz Sharif, who brokered it. Celebrations ensued worldwide as markets surged and oil prices fell, until Israeli jets struck Lebanon that morning, killing 357 civilians in what Beirut dubbed "Black Wednesday," while Israel excluded Lebanon from the deal. No formal agreement exists; conflicting statements emerged immediately, with Pakistan and Iran insisting it covered Lebanon, but Israel and the US rejecting that after a Trump-Netanyahu call. Lebanon, already devastated with over 2,000 deaths since March, was sidelined in a multi-front conflict involving Hezbollah, Iraqi militias, and Gulf interceptions. Post-ceasefire issues mounted: Iran kept the Strait of Hormuz choked, charging exorbitant fees and slashing traffic from 110 daily ships to four. Historic US-Iran talks in Islamabad on April 11 collapsed, prompting a US naval blockade that doubled down on the disruption, halting all oil route traffic (20% of global supply). The two-week truce window lasts until April 22 amid ongoing messages, but optimism fades after the deadliest civilian day coincided with its announcement.

Apr 17, 20264 min
#lebanon#trump#iran+5 more