Times of Bennett
ArticleFeatures

11,000 litres of milk: Spiritual offering or extreme prolifigacy?

Video Controversy SynopsisA video from April 9, 2026, showing 11,000 liters of milk (worth ₹5.5–7.7 lakh) poured into the Narmada River during a religious ritual sparked national outrage online, pitting devotion against accusations of waste, excess, and environmental harm.Public BacklashSocial media users condemned the act as irresponsible amid food insecurity and river pollution risks, arguing the milk should have fed the needy instead of treating the river like a "sink."Defenses and Expert WarningsSupporters defended it as sincere faith, but environmentalists like Subhash Pandey and Ajay Dube highlighted ecological damage: the organic load depletes oxygen, harms aquatic life, drinking water, and local communities.Broader ImplicationsThe Narmada's cultural significance amplified the debate, turning a local ritual into a flashpoint on balancing tradition with ethics, responsibility, and river health—raising timeless questions on when devotion crosses into waste.

Published:April 24, 2026 at 03:25 PM4 min read
11,000 litres of milk: Spiritual offering or extreme prolifigacy?
Correspondent: Aditya Zharotia

A video from the banks of the Narmada has turned a local religious offering into a wider public controversy on April 9, 2026, shows a large gathering beside the river as a tanker releases milk directly into the water during a religious ritual. What might have been viewed by participants as devotion quickly became, for many online, a symbol of excess, waste and environmental carelessness.

According to the reports, nearly 11,000 litres of milk were used in the ceremony. Social media posts around the video claimed that the milk alone may have been worth between ₹5.5 lakh and ₹7.7 lakh, a figure that helped intensify the backlash and made the ritual feel, to many viewers, not only symbolic but also staggeringly expensive.

The images were hard to ignore: a riverbank crowded with devotees, a priest leading rituals, and milk flowing into the Narmada in what was presented as an act of offering. The spectacle spread rapidly across platforms after being shared online, drawing attention far beyond the original gathering and placing the ritual at the centre of a familiar modern tension - the line between faith and public responsibility.

The outrage was immediate and pointed. Many users argued that a river should not be treated as a sink for milk, especially at a time when food insecurity and environmental strain remain everyday realities. Some criticised the act as wasteful and cruel, saying the milk could have been distributed to people in need instead. Others framed the issue more bluntly as a matter of river health and civic sense, insisting that religious expression should not dominate ecological consequences.


Yet the reaction was not one-sided. The same online discussion also revealed a quieter, but important, counter current: a defence of the ritual as a sincere expression of faith. Some supporters argued that the offering was voluntary and rooted in belief, and therefore should not be reduced to a social-media outrage cycle. That divide, devotion on one side, environmental alarm on the other is what made the episode so ignitable.

Environmental concern was not limited to the internet. Environmentalist Subhash Pandey, reported that 11,000 litres of milk can act as a significant organic pollutant. In other words, what may appear spiritually pure at the point of offering can become environmentally damaging once it enters a river ecosystem. That warning adds a practical dimension to the argument: rivers are not abstract symbols alone, but living systems that respond to what is poured into them.

Environmentalist and wildlife activist Ajay Dube said - "Such large quantities of organic matter can deplete dissolved oxygen in water, adversely affecting the river ecosystem. These impact local communities dependent on the river for drinking water and threaten aquatic life as well as domestic animals."

The Narmada itself occupies a special place in the cultural and religious imagination of central India, which is precisely why the images struck such a nerve. Rituals performed in its name are not unusual, but the scale of this offering changed the meaning of the act. It was no longer just about devotion; it became a public test of how far tradition can stretch before it collides with environmental ethics and common sense.

In the end, the controversy is larger than a single tanker of milk. It asks an uncomfortable question that keeps returning in different forms: when does devotion become waste, and who gets to decide where the boundary lies? For supporters, the answer may be faith. For critics, it is responsibility. For the river, however, the effect is immediate and measurable.

(This article is written by Aditya Zharotia, a master's student of Mass Communication. He's passionate about cinema, music and aspires to go into the advertising industry)
Tags
#narmada#subhash pandey#ajay dube#Milk#offering

Related Articles

Beyond Headlines: The war of West Asia from youth's lens
Article
Features

Beyond Headlines: The war of West Asia from youth's lens

Has the popularity of social media hastened war news reporting or sensationalism? Does the youth of today find themselves torn between deciphering real news and misniformation? This article aims to look beyond the surface and uncover the answers to these questions and more.

Apr 24, 20266 min
#west asia#prabhjot kaur#point+3 more
Certified Out of Existence: Why India's 2026 Trans Amendment Bill faced severe backlash
Article
Features

Certified Out of Existence: Why India's 2026 Trans Amendment Bill faced severe backlash

On March 13, 2026, India's government introduced the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill in the Lok Sabha, which swiftly passed both houses by March 25 and became law despite widespread protests from trans activists, lawyers, and opposition parties. The bill scraps self-identification for gender—upheld in the 2014 NALSA Supreme Court judgment—replacing it with mandatory medical certification by a board and District Magistrate approval, while limiting recognition to hijra, kinner, and intersex groups, effectively sidelining trans men, women, and non-binary individuals. It also imposes severe penalties, including life imprisonment, for "coercing" others into transgender identity, which critics fear could criminalize family and allies. Activists like Krishanu, Raghavi, Aryan Pasha, and Kanmani slammed it as unconstitutional (breaching Articles 14, 15, 19, 21), arbitrary, and reminiscent of colonial-era laws like the Criminal Tribes Act, with protests erupting in cities from Delhi to Hyderabad. Amid global anti-trans backsliding (e.g., TGEU's 2025 index, US and UK developments), figures like Aakar Patel of Amnesty International India decried it as state overreach on inherent identity. Affecting ~487,803 trans persons (only ~32,500 with ID cards), the law unravels hard-won rights, framing the fight as one for the state's recognition of self-naming over official control.

Apr 24, 20266 min
#bill#lok sabha#supreme court+2 more
BENNETT DIALOGUES launch with the War in West Asia
Article
Campus

BENNETT DIALOGUES launch with the War in West Asia

Bennett University has launched BENNETT DIALOGUES, a fortnightly talk series conceptualized by Chancellor Vineet Jain (Times Group MD) to help students grasp global geopolitical shifts. Led by Prof. Dhiraj Singh (Head, Centre for Media & Technology), it features informal fireside chats and Q&A with experts in geopolitics, business, and media. The series aims to connect world events to everyday impacts, like how the US-Israel-Iran war affects India's petrol and LPG prices. The inaugural edition on April 21 explores "The War in West Asia," with Times Now's Zakka Jacob and Dr. Waiel Awwad (Syrian-origin expert on West Asia conflicts, based in Delhi). Prof. Singh highlights its blend of Times Group media legacy and Bennett's academic excellence, benefiting media, liberal arts, business, and law students.

Apr 18, 20262 min
#dialogues#zakka jacob#dhiraj singh+3 more
War bugle disguised as a ceasefire: Examining Lebanon's situation post Israeli air strikes
Article
Features

War bugle disguised as a ceasefire: Examining Lebanon's situation post Israeli air strikes

On April 8, a fragile ceasefire briefly eased global tensions after 40 days of war between Israel, Iran, and allies, announced by Trump on Truth Social and confirmed by Iran and Pakistan's PM Shehbaz Sharif, who brokered it. Celebrations ensued worldwide as markets surged and oil prices fell, until Israeli jets struck Lebanon that morning, killing 357 civilians in what Beirut dubbed "Black Wednesday," while Israel excluded Lebanon from the deal. No formal agreement exists; conflicting statements emerged immediately, with Pakistan and Iran insisting it covered Lebanon, but Israel and the US rejecting that after a Trump-Netanyahu call. Lebanon, already devastated with over 2,000 deaths since March, was sidelined in a multi-front conflict involving Hezbollah, Iraqi militias, and Gulf interceptions. Post-ceasefire issues mounted: Iran kept the Strait of Hormuz choked, charging exorbitant fees and slashing traffic from 110 daily ships to four. Historic US-Iran talks in Islamabad on April 11 collapsed, prompting a US naval blockade that doubled down on the disruption, halting all oil route traffic (20% of global supply). The two-week truce window lasts until April 22 amid ongoing messages, but optimism fades after the deadliest civilian day coincided with its announcement.

Apr 17, 20264 min
#lebanon#trump#iran+5 more
Dhurandhar: Propaganda or not?
Article
Features

Dhurandhar: Propaganda or not?

This article attempts to find an answer to whether Dhurandhar a propaganda film or not? For a film so highly acclaimed and criticized, Dhurandhar has managed to become a topic of debate in almost every Indian household.

Apr 16, 20266 min
#dhurandhar#rekha pachauri#jaskirat singh rangi+2 more
Exploring Why The Voice of Hind Rajab Sparked a Quiet Censorship Storm in India
Article
Features

Exploring Why The Voice of Hind Rajab Sparked a Quiet Censorship Storm in India

The film "The Voice of Hind Rajab", directed by Tunisian filmmaker Kaouther Ben Hania, reconstructs the tragic final moments of six-year-old Palestinian girl Hind Rajab, killed in Gaza amid the Israel-Palestine conflict. It serves as a powerful commentary on civilian suffering, war's human cost, humanitarian crises, and global indifference, transforming a personal loss into a broader critique of geopolitical silence. The documentary has sparked controversy in India, where distributor Manoj Nandwana reports an oral block by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) due to fears it could strain India's strengthening ties with Israel in defence, tech, and trade. No formal written order exists, raising concerns about transparency, artistic freedom, and censorship influenced by diplomacy rather than by cinematic guidelines. Director Ben Hania voiced heartbreak on Facebook, lamenting the decision amid her lifelong love for India and Bollywood, while questioning if the "honeymoon" between the "world’s largest democracy" and the "only democracy in the Middle East" is so fragile. The case highlights broader trends of political sensitivities curbing films on contentious issues, unequal treatment of global narratives, and tensions between art, authority, and empathy in India's media landscape.

Apr 7, 20266 min
#hind rajab#kaouther ben hania#voice of hind rajab+2 more